Asset: GHO · Class: CDP · Date: 2023-08-15
Worst spread: −550 bps · Duration: ≈ 8 months below $0.99
Detected live: No (pre-Pegana retrospective)
Background
GHO is Aave’s native stablecoin, minted by users depositing supported collateral (mostly ETH and aTokens) and paying a borrow rate. At launch it had no Peg Stability Module — the only way to mint was open a CDP, the only way to retire GHO was repay debt. That asymmetry is a structural depeg trap.Trigger
Within weeks of launch GHO was trading 0.98 on Curve and Balancer. The 1.5% borrow rate let arbitrageurs mint GHO at 0.98, pocket 1 path from anyone holding GHO, the market couldn’t reach back up.**Cascade
- Curve’s GHO/3CRV pool stayed permanently imbalanced — depositors collected fees but couldn’t restore the peg.
- Aave’s borrow rate was too low to choke off new supply; raising it would have hurt legitimate borrowers.
- Each new mint cap increase moved the price lower as fresh GHO hit thin secondary liquidity.
- Other CDP stablecoins (crvUSD, LUSD) traded near-parity during the same period — the issue was specifically GHO’s mechanism.
Recovery
Aave governance shipped two interventions:- Raised the GHO borrow rate to ~5% to slow mint flow.
- Added a GHO Stability Module (GSM) allowing 1:1 swaps with USDC and USDT inside a cap.
What Pegana would have shown
- August 2023, week 1 — GHO crosses 100 bps spread.
PEGGED → DRIFT. - August 2023, week 3 — Spread crosses 200 bps.
DRIFT → DEPEG. - August 2023 to ~Q1 2024 — Spread fluctuates 250 – 550 bps. State stays in
DEPEGfor ~8 months with briefDEPEG → DRIFTducks when borrow rate hikes bit, then back toDEPEG. - Q2 2024 — GSM lands; spread compresses sustainably below 50 bps. After exit
dwell,
DEPEG → DRIFT → PEGGED.
time_in_DEPEG would have measured 240+ days of sustained
under-peg state — a structural signal of a mechanism that was designed wrong, not a
shock that needed to pass.